For the message about the cross is  foolishness to those who are perishing, 

but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.

- 1 Corinthians 1.18

A new directive in the German state of Bavaria requires that a cross hang above the entrance of every government building. Christian Moser, mayor of the Bavarian village of Deggendorf, doesn't see a problem. "This is about culture, not religion." Bavaria's premier, Markus Soder takes a similar view: "The cross is not a sign of religion." Indeed, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in 2011 the cross is "a passive symbol" with no overtones of indoctrination. Mayor Moser explains that when he hangs a cross in a city office, "It has to be visible, but also discreet." 

It shouldn't surprise anyone that religion is taking a nosedive in Bavaria even as Christian symbols mount a comeback. 

Paul had a different idea about the cross: He cared less about displaying it and more about proclaiming it. He did not think Christians should wear one; he thought they should bear one. Tradition tells us that the Roman Empire once displayed a cross in a public place - when they crucified Peter on one, upside-down. 

In America, when T-shirts, Bible covers, and internet memes drape crosses with the Stars and Stripes, or superimpose Betsy Ross's design over that ancient instrument of death, thoughtful Christians might do well to ask if such actions make the cross more about culture than about Christianity, empty it as a sign of religion, and turn an active offense into a passive symbol. As the cross becomes more visible, it also becomes more discreet.

A sensible cross may comfort, but only an offensive cross can save.